Collusion and Renegotiation in Principal-Supervisor-Agent Models∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
We aim at examining the interactions between collusion and renegotiation in a principal-supervisor-agent framework, in which the supervisor and agent can collude while the principal can subsequently renegotiate. Despite common sense and the findings in the literature that collusion and renegotiation are usually costly when considered separately, we find that they play a weakly positive role when considered jointly. The proposed framework unifies and reexamines the claims of some important studies in the literature, suggesting that, in organizational design, the issues of collusion and renegotiation should be studied in tandem.
منابع مشابه
Monitoring and Collusion with “Soft” Information
In the standard principal-supervisor-agent model with collusion, Tirole (1986) shows that employing a supervisor is profitable for the principal if the supervisor’s signal of the agent’s cost of production is “hard” (i.e., verifiable but hideable). Anecdotal evidence suggests that information is sometimes “soft” (i.e., unverifiable). We show that, in fact, it is profitable to employ a superviso...
متن کاملCollusion in Organizations and Management of Conflicts through Job Design and Authority Delegation
We analyze a principal-supervisor-two agent hierarchy with supervisory efforts, provide a characterization of the equilibrium of the game, and show which regime improves efficiency between the collusion-proof regime and the lateral collusion one, under the assumptions that the principal is less informed, and that the side-trade is costly. By coping with the trade-off between the value of inform...
متن کاملMechanism design with collusive supervision
We analyze an adverse selection environment with third party supervision. We assume that the supervisor and the agent can collude while interacting with the principal. As long as the supervisor is symmetrically informed with the agent, the former’s existence does not improve the principal’s rent extraction. This is due to the coalitional efficiency between the supervisor and the agent. However,...
متن کاملOptimality of linearity with collusion and renegotiation
This study analyzes a continuous–time N–agent Brownian moral hazard model with constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) utilities, in which agents’ actions jointly determine the mean and the variance of the outcome process. In order to give a theoretical justification for the use of linear contracts, as in Holmstrom and Milgrom (1987), we consider a variant of its generalization given by Sung (19...
متن کاملMoral Hazard and Renegotiation: Multi-Period Robustness
Is the second best outcome of static agency models renegotiation proof? In models with one period of renegotiation, Fudenberg and Tirole (1990) answer no when the principal makes the offer, while Ma (1994) and Matthews (1995) answer yes when the agent makes the offer. This paper analyzes the robustness of these two claims when there are more periods of renegotiation. With a known number of peri...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006